Inaugural Keynote Lecture


http://semt.inha.ac.kr/People.html
Prof. Jeonghwan Kimhttp://semt.inha.ac.kr/People.html
Department of Environmental Engineering, INHA University
jeonghwankim@inha.ac.kr



Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Membrane Bioreactor for Energy Positive Wastewater Treatment: Fouling Control and Energy Recovery
[ time, date ]

Interest in anaerobic treatment as an alternative to conventional aerobic treatment for domestic wastewater is growing rapidly. Although the anaerobic process has often been thought to be unsuitable for meeting stringent effluent quality, an integration of membrane with anaerobic bioreactor (AnMBR) can overcome this disadvantage. Membranes permit not only retaining the anaerobes in the reactor at relatively short hydraulic retention time, but also the maintaining of the long solid retention time that is required for efficient treatment. Nevertheless, the major concern with AnMBR is still the adequate control of membrane fouling caused by deposition of foulant material on membrane surface and/or within membrane pores. Traditionally, biogas sparging has been widely used to control membrane fouling through vigorous action along membrane surfaces. Cross-flow filtration has also been applied to induce back transport of foulants away from membrane under high shear conditions along membrane. However, these methods are reported to require high energy cost, which can detract from achieving potential energy-neutrality through anaerobic wastewater treatment. Novel method to control membrane fouling as an alternative to the gas-sparged or cross-flow based AnMBR is the anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (AFMBR), which combines membranes with anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor. Here, granular activated carbon particles are used as the fluidized media, providing not only high surface area for biofilm formation, but also a mechanical scouring action on membrane surface to control membrane fouling. GAC fluidization occurs by fluid recirculation through membrane reactor with relatively low energy consumption while providing excellent fouling control by mechanical scouring of membrane surface. In this presentation, experimental results to investigate effect of GAC fluidization on membrane fouling and energy consumption with AFMBR system treating domestic wastewater are discussed. Fouling control with respect to feed solution experiencing to the membrane and types of fluidized media is discussed. In addition, macroscopic approach to develop fouling models under GAC fluidization in AFMBR system is also presented.



http://www.ev.nctu.edu.tw/en/people/P1/Jih-Gaw-Lin-196043
Prof. Jih-Gaw Lin
http://www.ev.nctu.edu.tw/en/people/P1/Jih-Gaw-Lin-196043
Institute of Environmental Engineering, NCTU, Taiwan
jglin@mail.nctu.edu.tw
Deammonification for Sustainable Environment and Energy

[ time, date ]

One of the most significant energy-consuming industries in Taiwan is wastewater treatment, which presently uses more than 3% of our annual electricity demand (Taiwan Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan, 2015). This largely ignored problem stems from the unfortunate fact that aerobic waste processing (i.e., the conventional ‘gold-standard’ for wastewater treatment) requires intensive (and highly inefficient) aeration to supply aerobic bacteria with oxygen so that they might then oxidatively convert organic (i.e., fats, sugars, and protein to CO2) and inorganic (e.g., ammonia to nitrate) wastewater contaminants. Therefore, there is a need to pursue a paradigm-shifting strategy by which the energy-efficiency of wastewater treatment could be dramatically improved by advancing the roles of anaerobic and anoxic bio-based mechanisms in lieu of heavily relying on aerobic treatment. Indeed, the core idea is that switching away from predominantly aerobic wastewater treatment could transformatively reduce energy consumption while at the same time remarkably improving overall waste cleanup. 

The energy inefficiency of conventional aerobic waste treatment stems from two severe challenges: 1) that oxygen is highly insoluble in water, and 2) in spite of literally a century-plus period of intense research, the energetic efficiency of wastewater aeration is below (and often far lower than) 30%. Within our nation, there is yet another complicating factor in terms of escalating public and Taiwan EPA pressure to upgrade the ammonia removal in our roughly 60-plus municipal wastewater treatment facilities, and continuing to use aerobic technology will only further escalate our wastewater treatment energy demand. Rather understandably, therefore, pressure is mounting to improve both nation’s ammonia effluent standards and their level of applied technology to achieve these limits, but further use of conventional wastewater technology will only further exacerbate energy consumption to even higher levels. And a significant, complicating factor with ammonia removal is that this contaminant has a stoichiometric oxygen demand requirement more than four times larger in mass, such that every mg/L of ammonia-nitrogen consumes an astounding 4.5 mg/L of dissolved oxygen. Preliminary estimates, though, indicate that upgrading existing, conventional wastewater facilities with more advanced, but still aerobic, biological waste treatment systems to mitigate our current treatment inadequacies in nutrient pollution control will double current energy consumption, a politically and environmentally undesirable outcome. Simply put, our nation consequently has a compelling need to examine and adopt an advanced next-generation wastewater treatment strategy that shifts away from standard energy-consuming ‘aerobic’ dominant technology to solutions favouring energy-efficient, high-performance anaerobic and anoxic alternatives. 

This lecture will address: 1) that the wastewater industry should no longer focus on aerobic treatment processes intent on oxidatively ‘burning’ organic carbon and nutrient ammonia with aerobic bacteria (thereby gaining three positive outcomes, including reduced energy demand, reduced CO2 generation, and reduced nitrate generation), 2) that anaerobic processes be alternatively used as secondary treatment during organic carbon conversion, and that an advanced anoxic mechanism for ammonia transformation directly to nitrogen gas (i.e., deammonification process) be used as tertiary treatment (thereby further reducing oxygen consumption while at the same time eliminating the release of both ammonia and nitrate). A complete evaluation of the advanced next-generation wastewater treatment also includes microbial dynamic, fate of emerging contaminants in both anaerobic and anammox bioreactors and heavy metal removal in digested biosolids.



https://www.notavailable
Santanu Dasgupta
https://www.notavailable
Senior Vice President, Head of Biology, Reliance Industries Limited.
santanu.dasgupta@ril.com

Microalgal Biomass Generation: Synthetic biology led advances & innovation at Reliance Industries Limited

[ time, date ]

Innovations in biology, especially synthetic biology has made it easier to leverage living micro-organisms to produce products useful for human life and civilization.  We at RIL have developed cutting edge tools and technologies for synthetic biology to utilize the fullest potential of this opportunity.  Advances in synthetic biology and gene editing technology, bioinformatics and availability of different high-throughput technologies can enable significant increases in productivity of microorganism including algae to produce several value added products. Some of these developments at RIL will be discussed during the presentation.



 https://sites.google.com/site/2018icbseecopy/
ICBSEE 2018

http://www.iitkgp.ac.in/cv/bt-rksen;jsessionid=7E2E078C7C76D852ED30AA637A5D8000
Prof. Ram Krishna Senhttp://www.iitkgp.ac.in/cv/bt-rksen;jsessionid=7E2E078C7C76D852ED30AA637A5D8000
Bioprocess Engineering, IIT Kharagpur 
rksen@hijli.iitkgp.ernet.inr

Topic
[ time, date ]